Any attempts to rally the community for a particular purpose, such as voting for a poll, promoting a boycott, or advertising a petition, will be removed as it is considered a "call to action". It is strictly prohibited to engage in witch-hunting activities on this subreddit, and any sort of promotion or request for raiding servers is not allowed. Civil discussion is permitted, but using these traits as weapons is not allowed. It's okay to disagree with someone, but using ad hominem attacks instead of having an actual discussion is not acceptable.Īttacks based on gender, sexual orientation, disability, race, nationality, ancestry, or religion are prohibited. This rule list is a summary of consistent ones that pop up, so please check out the full rules list here.Ĭomments and posts that are intended to attack or insult other users are not allowed. r/discordapp is unofficial & community-run.Ĭome join the r/DiscordApp server! SUBREDDIT RULES Rule The only solution I can think about is to create a newtype wrapper for Vec, as suggested in the comments.Discord is a voice, video, and text communication service to talk and hang out with your friends and communities. You cannot overload the range operator either - it always creates a Range (or RangeInclusive, RangeFull, etc.). Such impl does not exist, and probably never will, but the rules are the same among all types, and in the general case this definitely can happen. The reason for these rules is that nothing prevents Range or Vec from implementing impl Index> for Vec. Type aliases do not affect locality.Īs neither Index nor Range nor Vec are local, and Range is not a fundamental type, you cannot impl Index> for Vec, no matter what you put in the place of the. struct Foo is considered local, but Vec is not. This is not affected by applied type arguments. Given trait Foo, Foo is always local, regardless of the types substituted for T and U.Ī struct, enum, or union which was defined in the current crate. A trait definition is local or not independent of applied type arguments. The T in Box is not considered covered, and Box is considered local.Ī trait which was defined in the current crate. Note that for the purposes of coherence, fundamental types are special. Only the appearance of uncovered type parameters is restricted.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |